• 01616 966 229
  • Request a callback
Stephensons Solicitors LLP Banner Image

Services
People
News and Events
Other
Blogs

Common disputes between shareholders and directors

View profile for Jade Fairhurst
  • Posted
  • Author
Office Meeting

In the corporate world, the relationship between shareholders and directors is fundamental to the functioning of a company. However, this relationship can sometimes give rise to disputes due to the distinct roles and powers assigned to each party. Understanding these common areas of conflict can help in managing and resolving such issues effectively.

It is important that individuals involved in a company understand the distinction between the roles of shareholder and director, together with the rights and responsibilities that attach to each position. Whilst the same person may hold both roles, they are legally separate and carry different powers. Many disputes arise because parties assume that rights enjoyed as a director continue after they cease to hold office, or alternatively that being a shareholder automatically entitles them to participate in the management of the company. A clear understanding of these distinctions can help avoid conflict.

Disputes over management decisions

One of the most common sources of conflict arises from disagreements over the management of the company. Directors are entrusted with the day-to-day management and decision-making powers of the company. Shareholders, on the other hand, typically have limited involvement in these operational matters. This division of powers can lead to disputes when shareholders feel that directors are making decisions that are not in the best interests of the company or its shareholders. While shareholders may be able to influence directors through shareholder resolutions, they generally cannot interfere with the directors' management powers whilst the directors remain in office.

Conflict over strategic direction

Shareholders and directors may have differing views on the strategic direction of the company. For instance, shareholders may prefer a conservative approach to growth, while directors may advocate for more aggressive expansion strategies. Such disagreements can create tension, particularly if shareholders believe that the directors' decisions could negatively impact their investment.

Appointment and removal of directors

Shareholders have the power to appoint and remove directors, which can sometimes lead to disputes. For example, shareholders may seek to remove a director due to dissatisfaction with their performance or decisions, while directors may resist such actions, arguing that they are acting within their management powers. This can create a power struggle, especially in cases where the shareholders and directors have differing visions for the company.

It is particularly important for individuals who are both shareholders and directors to understand the impact of stepping down or being removed as a director. Unless otherwise provided for in the company's articles of association, shareholders' agreement or other contractual arrangements, an individual who ceases to be a director will generally lose their right to participate in the day-to-day management of the company, attend board meetings, access information provided to directors and vote on board decisions. However, provided they retain their shares, they may continue to exercise the rights attached to those shares, including voting at shareholder meetings, receiving company information to which shareholders are entitled and receiving dividends where declared. Understanding which rights and responsibilities arise from directorship and which arise from share ownership is often critical to managing expectations and avoiding disputes.

Allegations of mismanagement or breach of duty

Shareholders may accuse directors of mismanagement or breaches of their fiduciary duties, such as acting in their own interests rather than in the best interests of the company. These allegations can lead to significant disputes, as they often involve questions of trust and accountability.

Access to information

Shareholders may feel that they are not being provided with sufficient information about the company's operations and financial performance. Directors, on the other hand, may argue that certain information is sensitive or confidential and should not be disclosed. This lack of transparency can lead to mistrust and disputes between the two parties.

Disputes in this area can be exacerbated where a former director remains a shareholder. Individuals who previously had unrestricted access to management information as directors may be surprised to find that, following their resignation or removal from the board, their rights to information are more limited. The extent of any continuing entitlement will depend on the company's constitutional documents and any agreements in place. Understanding these limitations from the outset can help avoid allegations that information is being improperly withheld.

Dividend policy

Disagreements over the distribution of profits can also lead to disputes. Shareholders may expect regular dividends as a return on their investment, while directors may decide to reinvest profits into the company for growth. This difference in priorities can create friction, particularly if shareholders feel that their interests are being overlooked.

Resolving disputes

To minimise and resolve disputes between shareholders and directors, it is essential to have clear and well-drafted articles of association and shareholders' agreements. These documents should clearly outline the roles, responsibilities and powers of each party, together with mechanisms for resolving conflicts. Open communication and transparency are also critical in maintaining a healthy relationship between shareholders and directors.

Companies should also ensure that shareholders and directors understand the legal distinction between their respective roles and the consequences of any changes to those roles. Particular attention should be given where an individual holds both positions, as disputes frequently arise when there is uncertainty about the rights that continue after a director resigns or is removed from office. Clearly drafted constitutional documents can help clarify these issues, manage expectations and reduce the risk of future conflict.

By understanding the common areas of conflict and taking proactive steps to address them, companies can foster a more productive environment, ensuring long-term success of the business.

Our specialist commercial law team deal with all kinds of shareholder and director disputes. If you need advice please contact us on 0161 696 6170.

Comments