Search site
Our People
Contact our offices
Make an enquiry
How can we help?
For those who have already appealed unsuccessfully we are able to make an application to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) providing there is merit to an application. The CCRC can consider the representations and, if satisfied that there is a real possibility that the conviction would be considered unsafe, can refer the case back to the Court of Appeal.
An application to the CCRC is not an opportunity to re run either the trial or the appeal. The commission is concerned only with the question whether or not there is new evidence or argument which gives rise to a real possibility that the Court of Appeal would quash your conviction if referred to them, or whether there are exceptional circumstances which would give rise to a real possibility.
The CCRC refers only a very small percentage of the cases it considers. Cases are referred to us by barristers, organisations and by our previous clients’ recommendations.
loading staff
We are a team committed to fighting miscarriages of justice. We have an enviable record of success at appeal, based on thorough analysis of what goes wrong at trial, the relentless search for new evidence and extensive experience of presenting cases in the Court of Appeal.
R v Gilfoyle (2) (2001) Crim LR 312. An appeal against a murder conviction based on fresh evidence.
R v Susan May LTL 2001. An appeal against a murder conviction based on fresh evidence regarding the integrity of the original police investigation.
R v Ian Thomas (2002) EWCA Crim 941. An appeal against murder conviction relating to the powers of the commission to refer.
R v Brannan and Murphy LTL 2002. An appeal against murder conviction based on fresh evidence and non disclosure. Conviction quashed.
R v Anthony Steel LTL 2003. An appeal against murder conviction based on unreliability of confession. Conviction quashed.
R v Boyle and Ford (2006)EWCA 2101 . An appeal against murder conviction based on arguments re adverse inference.
R v Adetoro (2006)EWCA Crim 1716. An appeal against robbery conviction based on arguments regarding adverse inference.
R v Tomlinson. [2003] EWCA Crim 758 An appeal against firearms and drugs offences re non disclosure
R v Kavanagh (2002)EWCA Crim 904. An appeal against murder conviction based on fresh expert evidence.
R v Branchflower (2009)EWCA Crim 1392. An appeal against murder based on arguments on legal directions given a trial.
R v Probyn (2005)EWCA Crim 2347. An appeal against murder conviction based on fresh expert evidence.
R v Haskayne (2007) EWCA Crim 2797. An appeal against drugs conviction based on material nondisclosure. Conviction quashed.
R v Simon Hall An appeal against murder conviction based on fresh expert evidence.
R v F (2009) EWCA Crim 319. An appeal against sentence involving implications of obligation to register as a sex offender (see also F and another v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2010)UKSC 12.
R v N . An appeal against conviction for sex offences based on fresh evidence and nondisclosure. Conviction quashed.
R v Traynor . An appeal against conviction for murder based on fresh evidence.
We're widely accredited for our work - regulatory & criminal justice
It is our business to deliver legal services that work for our clients, you can trust our specialists to take care of things on your behalf. Over the years our regulatory and criminal justice team has been recognised by industry awards and accredited for their excellence.
Based on count 310
We're Great
It is our business to deliver legal services that work for our clients, and you can trust our specialists to take care of things on your behalf.
Immediate support in a difficult situation resulted in a positive outcome. All concerned including the appointment of an appropriate Barrister should be congratulated on a very professional job well done.
View from a criminal defence & appeals client
Court of Protection protects teenage boy from his own 'impulsivity'
In the case of Buckinghamshire County Council and RT (by their guardian KT ) [2018] EWCOP 12, the Court of Protection has ruled that a 17 year old boy be deprived of his liberty at a specialist unit in order to protect him from his own ...
Twitter block 1 tweet
The Supreme Court has ruled on the case of a plumber who had argued he was being denied working rights in a decision expected to have serious ramifications for the ‘gig-economy’. Gary Smith has won the right to take his case to a tribunal...
Crime reorder
We're always here for you
As an award-winning top 150 law firm, with over 450 staff based in offices across the country, you're never far from the advice you need.
Find your nearest Stephensons office and arrange a meeting
As an award-winning top 150 law firm, with over 450 staff based in offices across the country, you're never far from the advice you need.
