As we enter spring - the growing season, farms become very industrious places, whether they handle livestock or grow crops and other food produce. As such, more jobs become available in the agricultural industry from spring right through the end...
How can we help?
Client receives £82,500 for psychological harm
Our client was working on a construction site and was operating a large dumper truck. He began to reverse down a road when he accidentally hit another worker on the building site, sadly causing his death. He did not see this work colleague due to a faulty camera on the truck. Further, this worker should not have been in the area and no foot paths or traffic routes had been established on the site. As a result of the accident, Mr TCH suffered psychologically in the form of flashbacks, anxiety and panic attacks. He was diagnosed with post traumatic stress disorder and underwent extensive psychological counselling and treatment. His condition has affected his ability to work.
This was an unusual case and the defendant alleged that Mr TCH was unable to claim as a secondary victim. However, arguments were advanced that our client fell within a limited exception to this rule under the case of Dooley v Cammell Laird & Co [1951] 1 Lloyds Rep 271 whereby it could be contended that he was a primary victim on the basis that the defendant’s negligence put him in a position where he caused the death of another, which has resulted in psychiatric harm. This argument was ultimately successful.
Our client received £82,500.
loading staff
The true extent of child abuse in England and Wales is unknown, which is partly because survivors find it difficult to speak about what happened to them. In addition to this, it is not something that is often discussed or well understood. But there are...
- Louise Griffiths
- Danielle Callaway
- Robert Donlan
- Pauline Smith
- Shahina Sakeria
- Katie Plappert
- Stephen Collins
- Toni Lowery
- Andrew Dunne
- Subiha Khezar